Evidence in constitutional proceedings: issues of methodological foundations

It is indicated that the realities of social life, political situation, global processes transformation phenomena and require legal precision in understanding fundamental prescriptions specified by Constitution, as well ensuring compliance legislation with its provisions. Regarding first question, there are two ways solving it: detailing provisions, which to a certain extent creates bulky codified texts difficult apply, or clear, comprehensive formulations constitutional norms, provide for establishment principles functioning state power society, without detailed extended texts. The practice international constitutionalism only confirms last version constitutions more convincing apply. For example, Constitution United States America, approved 1787, still effect today has undergone 27 amendments. Explaining reasons such stability, famous American lawyer A. Cox points out «the original serves us well, despite enormous changes all areas life States, because creators had enough wisdom invest it exactly much was needed, but no more.»
 noted one main places given process proving collecting evidence proceedings. This due fact on basis correctly collected fair judgment can be rendered, addition, trial itself will take place leading - competition equality parties. At same time, proof (regardless type judicial procedure) common features knowledge.
 claimed cognitive carried order established law covers activities subjects involved And therefore, proceedings knowledge proceedings, at time represents combination both procedural activities. component characterizes cognition, special form cognition takes within framework rules justice.